Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts

Friday, November 20, 2015

The Real Problem With The Syrian Refugees

Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. - Buddha

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. - Winston Churchill

The #1206 “fiction” series continues …


In a refugee camp somewhere in Turkey, in the middle of the chaos, the blended cacophony of animal, man and machine, the stench of unwashed bodies, the stink of raw sewage and the smell of cooking food, a small child sat, looking from side to side for comfort and for love ……

…. crying.


…. while evil men and women planned ways to sneak terrorists into Europe amongst the innocent fleeing for their lives ….


…. while powerful people who never liked the European Union saw the tsunami of refugees as the leverage they’ve always sought to disband the union or at least re-establish the borders of their nation as in days of old ….


…. while other powerful people sought to leverage the plight of the desperate to prove that the idea of the European Union was worth saving ….


…. while certain banks and corporations sought ways to improve the bottom line while promoting a message of service to humanity ….


…. while ordinarily good, rational people tore each other apart on social media over whether refugees were safe to accept or not, forgetting that an intelligent, respectful common ground needed to be found quickly between the people who believed that all refugees were terrorists and those who believed that no terrorists could sneak in amongst the displaced, arguing from the comfort of their homes as people died in the wilderness ….


…. while politicians sought to leverage useful material from an affront to humanity, either within their party, within their nation or across the globe ….


…. while charities sought donations to help the ravaged and the homeless, even those charities who had no intention of actually helping them ….


…. while mass media sought the best heart-tugging story to win the ratings war, oblivious to the real human causalities ….


…. while military engines around the world cited the refugee crisis as the justification for a budget request for a new gun, bomb, plane or ship design ….


…. while religions attempted to re-establish why they mattered as they demonstrated their outreach potential or their innocence ….


…. three men in a darkened room observed the holographic images before them.

“This crisis spins forever as does many other that they have piling up”, observed the first man as he stared at the images, “Why do you think this is?”

“Perhaps”, offered the second, “they are so focused on their own intentions that they have lost sight of what they should be doing and the carnage that is ensuing while they pontificate on what is best.  Maybe they don’t really care as much as they would have others believe.”

“Or maybe”, said the third quietly, “just maybe, it is possible that too many people benefit from things remaining just the way they are, with the innocent being tossed aside as collateral damage.”

The images before them disappeared until only one was remaining.

As they stared at the image before them, the first man said, “Maybe it is none of these reasons.  Maybe there is a simpler but darker reason that you are both overlooking.  What if such divisiveness was useful to someone for another reason?”

The second man started to speak but then closed his mouth in silence, reflecting on what he had just heard before returning his gaze to the hologram.

The three men stared in silence at the image of a small child ….

…. crying.

To be continued.


© 2015 – Harry Tucker – All Rights Reserved

Background

Read into this what you will, come to any conclusions you wish to reach, accept any responsibility that you have the courage to accept and blame all the people you want to blame.

While we argue over “stuff”, while people seek to use such events to their advantage, while people argue vehemently, disrespectfully, dishonestly and ruthlessly without facts (relying on emotion or agendas) and while people lack the ability to solve problems intelligently, respectfully, collaboratively and ego-lessly, innocent people are dying, either genuine refugees or people at the hands of terrorists.

We need to recognize the importance of finding solutions to both problems quickly.

And then we need to recognize that we are all either part of the problem ….

…. or part of the solution ….

…. but not both.

Which would you like to be?

Which do you think you are?

How do you know?

Series Origin

This series, a departure from my usual musings, is inspired as a result of conversations with former senior advisors to multiple Presidents of the United States, senior officers in the US Military and other interesting folks as well as my own professional background as a Wall St. / Fortune 25 strategy advisor and large-scale technology architect.

While this musing is just “fiction” (note the quotes) and a departure from my musings on technology, strategy, politics and society, as a strategy guy, I do everything for a reason and with a measurable outcome in mind. :-)

This “fictional” musing is a continuation of the #1206 series noted here.

Monday, September 7, 2015

Courage - What the Syrian Refugee Situation Reveals About Us

Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favor. - Robert Frost

It is a fool's prerogative to utter truths that no one else will speak. - Neil Gaiman

It is a very lonely life that a man leads, who becomes aware of truths before their times. - Thomas Reed

The #1206 “fiction” series continues …


Abigail walked down the forest path in silent thought, her brain turning over the events of the week.  She was trying to make sense of things locally and globally and on some days she did better than others.

She sighed and looked up at the fall sky and wondered why God allowed all of these things to happen.

“It’s a pretty complicated world, isn’t it?”, a voice to her right asked, causing Abigail to jump with a start.

Abigail looked towards the source of the voice and found herself looking at a tall, thin man whose glittering eyes looked intently into hers.

“I’m sorry”, he said with a smile, “I didn’t mean to startle you.”

“It’s ok”, said Abigail, feeling uncomfortable about standing next to a stranger while being miles from anywhere … and help if she needed it.

“Isn’t that what you were thinking?”, the stranger asked, “Wondering why the world seems so complicated.”

“Well, yes”, stammered Abigail, slightly confused by the stranger’s sudden appearance, his awareness of what she was thinking and his directness.

“Please share your thoughts”, the stranger said with a smile.

“Well”, began Abigail, “I was thinking about a local election result in Alberta.  The Party that thought it was going to win lost.  Even though they lost the general election in a big way, they still believed that they had this by-election in the bag despite accusations of dishonesty in their campaign.  A lot of people inside their party, including elected officials, executives and members of various boards complained vehemently in secret and predicted a loss but they refused to allow their concerns to be revealed in public or to have their name attached to any dissension.  Now after the election, they are still arguing and criticizing each other in secret but few have any interest in voicing their concerns or collaborating towards helping their party improve.  They even privately praise people who have the courage to point out the issues in the Party while publicly expressing discomfort about the same people.”

She paused for a moment before saying quietly, “It just doesn’t make sense.”

“It does make sense”, said the stranger, “You just answered the very question you are pondering.”

Abigail looked at him quizzically.

“Courage”, said the stranger empathically, “It takes no effort, responsibility or accountability to complain, criticize and undermine in private.  It takes great courage to voice a concern, raise an issue or dare to point out that something is wrong.  Few people have sufficient courage to do what is right when they are called to do so.  They secretly admire those who have courage while simultaneously resenting them either secretly or publicly for having the courage that they wish they had.”

Abigail listened in silence.

“It creates a strange duality within people”, continued the stranger, “They are consumed by the need for the world to be better and in fact, are consumed by their need to be a part of that change but when it is time for them to take action, they take none and resign themselves to expressing frustration to people who can’t change the problem or who don’t care enough to change it.”

The stranger looked at her intently, his eyes glittering in the soft autumn sun.

“There is a lot of that going around, Abigail”, he said, both gently and accusingly.

“What do you mean?”, asked Abigail.

“Well”, replied the stranger, “Take the situation with the Syrian refugees.  The travesties in Syria have been going on for years with hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children dying every year.  Many people have pointed this out but government leaders have done absolutely nothing.  For the most part, these leaders have been able to hide from the problem and contain it within the borders of Syria, not having the courage or the will to do something greater.  Now that the refugees have spilled over the border, they have become a problem that no one can hide and so world leaders are now forced to take a stand.”

He paused for a moment, frowning as he did so.

“Ironically”, he continued, “Many of these same leaders now call upon global courage to do something when in fact it was their own lack of courage that has allowed this to grow into the disaster that it has become.  When we don’t use our courage when called upon, things always get worse and in fact, sometimes they get much worse.  Have you ever noticed as well that when there are important things to be done either at home or abroad, that politicians and others throw out questions to unrelated problems which they claim are higher priority and need to be addressed right away?  Meanwhile, others rally people around demonstrations, petitions, social media “likes” and other mundane things that don’t help the situation at all nor do they help the people who are in trouble but somehow the organizers assert that the feel-good gesture has had a huge impact despite having accomplished absolutely nothing.  That’s their way of misdirecting your attention away from what really needs to be addressed and to keep you from seeing that they don’t have any answers for the things that matter.”

Abigail nodded but said nothing.

The stranger noted her agreement and continued.  “Whether it’s a political party in Alberta or an international disaster in Syria, choosing to ignore what needs to be done because one doesn’t feel that one has enough courage will cause one to need much more courage later as the problem grows in complexity.  Sometimes, unfortunately, this delay can result in problems becoming unsolvable or very dangerous or can even create new problems currently unanticipated.”

“But political leaders, even our own, are promising a lot of aid and relief now”, protested Abigail.

“True”, replied the stranger, “but much of their promises serve their gain right now.  When they could have prevented the problem but there was nothing in it for them, they ignored it.  Now they can’t ignore it and can possibly leverage it into personal gain.  Aren’t the leaders who are now promoting help in the middle of political campaigns and in need of deeds that show that they are true leaders?  Now they can spin their previous lack of courage into deeds of courageousness, humanity and leadership.  Do you not see the coincidence?”

“But how can little people like me change the world?”, asked Abigail, “I have nothing to offer and no influence.”

“That is your lack of courage and conviction talking”, replied the stranger, “But remember what I said.  A lack of courage and conviction today produces much larger problems tomorrow.  You must find a way to allow your courage to be the change you want to see while it still matters.  But first, you must make a decision to do something …. anything.  The power that comes from conviction and a decision to do something is essential.”

Abigail walked in silence for a short distance when a question dawned on her.

She turned to ask the stranger …. but he was gone.


In a hot, sweltering room in Palmyra, not far from Damascus, a group of men crowded around a map of Europe.

The outflow of humanity spreading outwards from Syria had proven to be the perfect Trojan Horse, allowing their own operatives to comingle with the hundreds of thousands of people who were the victims of the lack of courage of world leaders.

The lack of courage in those leaders was about to be replaced by the courage within their own martyrs.

“Courage always manifests in one side or the other”, thought one of the men as he studied the map.

“One man’s cowardice becomes another man’s opportunity”, he thought as he smiled at his colleagues.

To be continued.


© 2015 – Harry Tucker – All Rights Reserved

Background

The political party referenced in this blog post is the PC Party of Alberta, whose private conversations between members over text, social media private messaging and emails show a great deal of concern, unhappiness and unrest.

However, ask those same people to bring forth their concerns to help the Party become better and they become afraid, not wanting their comments to be shared publicly or have their name attached to them in any way.

They somehow need their Party to heal itself as if by magic while simultaneously complaining that it is taking too long.

Meanwhile, a lot of passionate, intelligent people with great ideas remain silent, condemning their Party to greater difficulty down the road.

I remember some years ago when I sat on the board for a children’s charity and it was discovered that a senior executive within that organization was up to no good, siphoning money out of the charity’s coffers for personal use, using trips on behalf of the organization to make plans for his own company, running at odds with the Canada Revenue Agency and other things.

As board members found out about his dalliances, they all came to me with basically the same message:

This really bothers meYou should do something about this.

I asked them why I should do something about it when they had data I didn’t have and because it was affronting them.  They presented a number of excuses including “Well I’m also on the board of …….”, “I don’t want to make waves because …..”, “I don’t want to be thrown out of the organization because ….”, “I don’t want to damage the reputation of the charity” and a number of other things.

The truth was that they wanted to hedge their bets – they wanted things to be fixed but they didn’t want to go out on a limb to do so and they didn’t want to be left alone in case their effort to correct things didn’t garner support, leaving them standing by themselves and feeling foolish (at least from their perspective).

In other words – they lacked the courage to be the change they wanted and demanded to see.

By the time I had enough data to realize that the individual in question was breaking the law and recognizing my liability exposure and responsibility as a board member, I challenged the individual in a board meeting and resigned when the board refused to support me publicly (even though they pleaded with me privately to do something).

While board members privately marvelled at my so-called courage, they didn’t follow up by voting the individual out of the organization until a few months later when they realized that he really was breaking the law.  When they tried to force him out, he told them that since they had known since my resignation that he was breaking the law, he would blow the whistle on them also as accomplices unless they forked over a small fee in order to keep him quiet.

You would expect that with extortion on top of everything else, that these people would finally have had the gumption to send this guy to jail, right?

No – they paid him using the charity’s money and he used the money to start his own company, a company that still thrives.

The world is a lot like that political party and that charity.  We complain a lot to others but rarely have the courage to speak out or take appropriate action.

Why?

What do we think this will accomplish?

Will the world get better or worse when the people who are the most self-motivated are the only ones showing courage and whose actions aren’t always in the best interests of others?

Is that good enough for you?

Is that good enough for your family?

How do you know?

What are you willing to do about it?

We need to fix the problem with the Syrian refugees while not compromising our own security.

But more importantly, we need to show courage in not allowing things like this to happen in the first place.

Meanwhile, the media (both mainstream and social) will continue to tug at our heartstrings, filling our mind with travesties from places like Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia and Syria until they find another subject to move on to.  Despite the clamor for justice and solutions at the moment, the people in the countries just named will continue to suffer out of sight and out of mind long after our attention has moved on to the next suffering du jour.

Unfortunately, we are human and as such, likely won’t learn from the event in Syria or elsewhere until the stakes are much greater.

By then, it may be too late.

Series Origin

This series, a departure from my usual musings, is inspired as a result of conversations with former senior advisors to multiple Presidents of the United States, senior officers in the US Military and other interesting folks as well as my own professional background as a Wall St. / Fortune 25 strategy and large-scale technology architect.

While this musing is just “fiction” and a departure from my musings on technology, strategy, politics and society, as a strategy guy, I do everything for a reason and with a measurable outcome in mind. :-)

This “fictional” musing is a continuation of the #1206 series noted here.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

9/11–What Have We Learned After 12 Years?

“There is something fundamentally unfair about a government that takes away so much of people's money, power, and personal control while telling them that life will be better as a result.” - Steve Forbes

“Remember the hours after September 11th when we came together as one to answer the attack against our homeland. We drew strength when our firefighters ran upstairs and risked their lives so that others might live; when rescuers rushed into smoke and fire at the Pentagon; when the men and women of Flight 93 sacrificed themselves to save our nation’s Capitol; when flags were hanging from front porches all across America, and strangers became friends. It was the worst day we have ever seen, but it brought out the best in all of us.” –Sen. John Kerry

As I took my morning walk this morning, I stopped and watched some young children playing at a local playground.

It is a beautiful sunny Tuesday morning and I am reminded that it is almost identical to a beautiful sunny Tuesday morning 12 years ago that became the worst nightmare in US history.

As I watched the children play and my mind replayed the events of 9/11, I reflected on what has changed since then.

And I wonder what we have learned.

Airline Security

Despite the billions we have spent on airline security, including advanced screening equipment and reinforced cockpit doors, there are still easy ways to get bombs on planes as well as techniques that can force pilots to open the cockpit door and give up control of their aircraft.

Our invasion of Libya also caused the “accidental misplacement” of thousands of shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles capable of downing commercial aircraft.  Many of these missiles are believed to now be in the hands of Al Qaeda-friendly forces.

Ok … so we’re not doing so well there.

International Relations

On the international front, we continue to try random experiments with diplomacy in the hope that things will just work out perfectly by accident, with little or no knowledge or care of the downstream effects of our actions.

Examples ….

We embraced and even promoted the Arab Spring movement and watched it destroy proud nations like Egypt.

Iraq and Afghanistan are no more stable now than ever and in fact, in some parts of those countries, they are more lawless and dangerous now than they ever were.  What did our brave servicemen and women accomplish there despite the great sacrifices they made for themselves and their families?

Libya is now considered to be lawless and in ruin since we removed Gadhafi, with thousands of armed militants roaming the countryside and providing a training ground for tomorrow’s terrorist generation.

The complexities of Syria continue to simmer, with the US government willing to engage in a military strike even before evidence was available as to who “the enemy” was and with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff admitting that he had no idea what the objective would be or what the downstream effect of a military strike would be.  Let’s not forget also that with Russia sending in defensive forces to back Syria, it wouldn’t take much to accidentally create a larger global conflagration.

And so our random experiments with diplomacy are doing little outside of creating more countries that are unstable, something proven to be a breeding ground for terrorists.

Hmmmm … we’re not doing so well there either.

Meanwhile back home

Meanwhile back home, our political leaders continue to brew a dangerous concoction that brings no peace to the world nor does it bring additional security to the citizens whom they claim to serve.

And just to complicate things, the threat of domestic terror along the lines of the Boston Marathon Bombing is something that many enforcement officials have indicated is practically unpreventable with current laws.

John Kerry’s 9/11 quote when he was Senator is wonderfully patriotic and yet conveniently glosses over the truth that decisions that he and his colleagues made helped draw the ire of terrorists in our direction in the first place.

It would be like a fireman setting fire to a building and then running inside, saving the occupants and proclaiming himself to be a hero.

The people who participated in the events that led up to 9/11 and who play games of random diplomacy get to enjoy security for themselves and their families for life while innocent civilians who care little for political, diplomatic and military tit for tat exercises pay the ultimate price.

I think of my friends who died that day in the World Trade Center, including but not limited to:

- Narender Nath, who saw the best in everyone.

- Stephen Fiorelli, a Port Authority engineer who stayed behind to guide the brave first responders.

- Eric Bennett, who was constantly helping and serving others as much as he could.

I think of my neighbor’s brother who died on Flight 93.

I think of my other neighbor whose office was across the street from the World Trade Center and who watched many of the people jump from the towers.  He was deeply impacted by the event and 6 months later was dead, having been so traumatized by what he saw that the images that replayed in his mind eventually took his Life.

These wonderful citizens, fathers, husbands and Life partners didn’t give a rats behind about what our diplomats and politicians did abroad and in fact, because of national security constraints, couldn’t have known even if they wanted to.

They didn’t sign up to fight any wars.

They didn’t volunteer to be sent into harm’s way.

And yet they paid the ultimate sacrifice anyway but have “the honor” of being publicly named at patriotic memorials every year.

I wonder if part of the problem is that once our leaders transformed from being those who lead people into battle into those who send people into battle, they become less aware of the real impact of their choices on the innocent.

If our leaders started losing their own loved ones as a direct result of their actions, perhaps they might have an incentive to think and act differently when it comes to the decisions they make. << Dear NSA.  That is an observation and not a threat. Stand down. >>

Perhaps.

Why we remember 9/11

Someone asked me recently why we bother to remember the events of 9/11 and suggested that perhaps we should let it fade into the past and allow healing to take place.

The problem is that when we forget the events that led up to 9/11, we release from accountability those who have helped create it and those who continue to stoke the fire for the next big event.

An event that will probably once again exempt those who helped architect or contribute to it while sacrificing those who have nothing to do with it.

An event that we will claim took us by surprise.

An event that will draw a revenge response on our part.

An event that will add more names of the innocent to the lists that we read during patriotic memorial events.

We all play a role in this

We are not without responsibility in how 9/11 came to pass nor are we without responsibility for preventing such events from occurring in the future.

How we responded to Syria is an indicator that we haven’t learned a damned thing .… yet.

And until we start learning something from that painful day on 9/11, we must accept that the lives of those lost were indeed sacrificed in vain and that we are potentially worse off and in a more precarious situation than ever.

Meanwhile back at the playground

As my mind returns to the children in the playground, I think about the people who worry about the color of their next iPhone or whether their designer coffee has a little too much “whatever” in it and I wonder.

If we spent more time focusing on what is right for the next generation and not what is right for ourselves, I think we would realize the right thing to do, whether it’s in the selection of our leaders or how we hold our leaders to be accountable  in regards to domestic and foreign policy.  We would also know what our own responsibilities are for co-creating a stronger potential for future generations.

I think that the events of the world, while seeming to be chaotic and disturbing, are that way because someone benefits from allowing this to happen or from creating such an environment.  Sometimes the list of those who benefit is not always obvious as Esquire magazine generated extra web traffic this morning by showing this outrageous picture.  The picture is of an unknown man falling to his death from the World Trade Center on 9/11 accentuated with tasteless text added by Esquire.

I think that we need to work harder to be the voice for those who don’t have one (or don’t believe they do), to offer a hand-up to those who have stumbled, to show love to those who feel that love has abandoned them, to stand up for those who feel overcome by the world and to be the champion for those who seek someone to look up to.

I think that we need to work harder at being the light that lights someone else’s path.

I think that we need to work harder at being the salt that seasons the Earth and the great variety of Life that exists on it.

I think that we need to share more with those who have less.

I think that we need to help others follow their dreams as we need others to help us follow ours.

I think that we need to move beyond labels that differentiate us and seek the things that unify and unite us.

I think that we need to model the behavior that we want to see in future generations.

I think that we need to try harder to live every day as if it might be our last …. because eventually that does become our reality.

And finally, even as an optimist I think that the world only gets better when we make a choice to make it that way, that a world of unlimited potential doesn’t happen by accident. 

While it would be great to write a heart-tugging, peace-and-love-overcomes-everything blog, history teaches us that the world and humanity don’t work this way.

Or can I be proven wrong?

I would like to be.

What do you think?

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum – September 11, 2013

In the days that followed 9/11, I found myself repeatedly playing a song by Styx.

The song came to mind again this morning.  Here it is …. “Show Me the Way”.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Politics–Converting a No Into a Yes

It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men. - Samuel Adams

The average voter has to hear a point seven times before it registers. - Paul Weyrich

The political and media fight to convince Americans to attack Syria continues unabated, being driven by passionate pleas from President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry.

Since many people thought that their initial reaction to reject the strike seemed like a no-brainer, many have wondered why the appeal to attack Syria has not only continued unabated but appears to have escalated.

They forget that politicians are using a tried-and-true technique that commonly turns a passionate “no” into an equally rabid “yes”.

Here is what the process looks like (click on the image for a larger version of it).

image

It’s an iterative battle, with each proposal using information gleaned from the previous rejection and playing on people’s emotions as I wrote about in Anger: Setting Yourself Up For Manipulation

Occasionally, if the message recipient is particularly resistant to the message, more than one iteration may be necessary within each of the steps shown above.  In addition, some steps may occasionally have to be revisited if something new is added to the message that introduces resistance that was not previously expressed by the message recipient.

Each proposal not only factors in the responses from the previous proposal but includes a lot of additional information that is misleading or which overloads the recipient so that they cannot create the space necessary to properly evaluate the proposal before them.

Each iteration also gets more complex, the stakes get higher and the deadlines become more critical (at least as suggested by the politician).

It is a battle of attrition … one which the average citizen eventually loses (most times, not all) because they don’t have the resources to keep fighting, the information to make an intelligent choice, the time to keep fighting or because they are so worn out just trying to survive their own battles that they don’t have the energy to fight something which they have become convinced is not a big deal to them anyway.

Such techniques are not limited to the Syria issue.

In fact, it’s the common technique that politicians use to bring you to their viewpoint instead of the other way around, the latter being a more appropriate, more effective form of representation “for the people, by the people”.

Who will win the battle?

It depends on how badly each side wants to win their side of the argument and whether or not someone else enters the conversation with an idea that either works for all parties involved or derails the original intention of one side or the other.

What side of the battle are you on?

Would you recognize the signs that the other side is changing your position even if it against your fundamental beliefs?

Are you sure?

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum – September 9, 2013 – Resisting the Cycle

I would be remiss in my thoughts if I didn’t share a brief musing on resisting the cycle described in this blog.

Many people are susceptible to the traps described in this blog because they respond with emotion (not to be confused with passion) instead of data / facts.

If one responds with requests for data / facts (or responds with data / facts to challenge the original assertions), one has a better opportunity to get to truths and to be able to make effective choices based more on truth and less on emotion.

People who hide behind “everyone knows this”, “it’s protected under national security” or something similar or who respond to data or requests for data with sharp emotion don’t have facts.

When they don’t have facts, they aren’t worthy of your time, your influence or your support.

And when you can use their own data against them, that’s even better.

It reminds me of the apocryphal story of the man who was solicited in the mail by a fraudulent evangelist who promised that for every $100 that the man sent to the evangelist, God would reward him in kind with 7x the donation from unexpected sources.

The man wrote on the donation card “If you truly believe that God rewards people in this way, why don’t you send me $100 a month and you will receive $700 as you describe”.

He never heard from the evangelist again.

Friday, September 6, 2013

The Alternate Reality of Politicians

Divide and rule, the politician cries; unite and lead, is watchword of the wise. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

A hypocrite is the kind of politician who would cut down a redwood tree, then mount the stump and make a speech for conservation. - Adlai E. Stevenson

I have always been fascinated by the alternate reality that politicians live in.

Take for example, The Minister of Municipal Affairs in Alberta, the Honorable Doug Griffiths.

When asked to comment on Opposition Leader Danielle Smith’s plans to hold a town hall to once again express anger over the RCMP and their seizure of weapons in flood-ravaged High River, Alberta, he made an interesting faux pas when he said:

“I am sick and tired of people like her going around trying to blame people when we’re still trying to rebuild the community. It’s fucking embarrassing.”

One of the rules of politics (and business) is that you never let your opponent see you sweat.  As the Opposition Leader, Ms. Smith is paid to represent her constituents, lead her party AND get under the skin of the government.

When a member of the government drops the f-bomb as a result of her actions, the Opposition Leader can only think “mission accomplished – what else can I do to to continue this momentum?”

In addition, in the business world, such words issued against a colleague would immediately motivate HR to investigate – requiring an apology at best or other disciplinary action, including termination.

This rarely happens in the political world.  Even when an Alberta member of government was found to be using his government influence for the benefit of his own company, he was found to be guilty of unethical behavior but not illegal.

I guess it comes down to realities and rationalization. :-(

And finally, we are always loudly trumpeting anti bullying / anti intimidation legislation, especially legislation designed to create a better world for children.

But it doesn’t matter how much legislation we pass to encourage people to treat others with respect.

People model what they see

Unfortunately, politicians can pass legislation that promotes one idea while living another and not see the difference between them.

Meanwhile in High River …..

Ms. Smith held another town hall in High River where angry residents had another opportunity to vent the anger they have vented repeatedly, the only difference being that this time, they had an opportunity to vent it towards representatives of the RCMP.

The reasons for their anger have been documented and expressed many times since June so I’m not certain that another round of yelling and screaming “moves the ball”.

In the real world, upon first capturing the essence of a problem, a problem solver says “I hear you loud and clear.  I will do what it takes to get this resolved and will report periodically on progress or ask for your opinion should we reach a point where decisions needs to be made”.

But in the political world, while Ms. Smith may have taken some actions on behalf of her constituents, she is still focused on the importance of whipping up anger.

The time for anger has passed.

What matters now is focus on execution and results that benefit the people of High River.

Continued anger and outrage in lieu of results only benefits the politician who encourages it.

In the real world, anyone who has their marching orders but continues to convene meetings to revisit their marching orders will cause people to think:

  • Did this person not hear us the first time?
  • Does this person not know how to solve this problem?
  • We have already expressed our anger over this – why does this person want us to keep revisiting our anger instead of solving the problem?
  • Why are we wasting our time rehashing everything we already know?
  • If we meet enough times, maybe we need to turn our attention to the person who keeps reconvening us.

But this is not the real world.

This is politics, where anger and obfuscation are often more useful than results, as I posited here - Anger: Setting Yourself Up For Manipulation.

Ms. Smith knows what the issues are, she knows the anger that is simmering amongst the citizens and she knows what is at stake.

All that is left are measurable results that benefit citizens – the bane of many politicians.

And speaking of producing measurable results that benefit citizens ….

President Obama is insisting on the need to perform a military strike against Syria when he, John Kerry and their many political and military advisors cannot publicly identify the actual threat to America, the benefit to America in carrying out the attack or the downstream ramifications of what might happen should an attack be launched.

And as I listen to them play chess with our safety and our lives yet again, I think of the 15 close friends that I lost in the World Trade Center almost 12 years ago and the thousands of loved ones who were lost on that day and in the wars that followed.

When politicians use our security, our well being and our lives in the grand scheme of the strategy game they are engaged in, they do it with lots of upside and little downside … for themselves.

My friends cared little for the political, diplomatic and military tit for tat exercises that ultimately produced their death.

Meanwhile, the people who participated in the events that led up to 9/11 have moved on to bigger and better things, safe behind the security only available to those who play God with the lives of others.

The bottom line

The greatest challenge in our world is that the definitions of reality in the real world and the political world will continue to diverge until all politicians are forced to live the realities that they create for others.

Only then will they realize what needs to be done and how quickly it needs to be done in order to create a better world for everyone.

As James Freeman Clarke once said:

A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum

Minister Griffiths has apologized for his use of the f-bomb as noted earlier.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Experiencing the Voice of God

When you are in tribulation and all these things come upon you, in the latter days you will turn to the Lord your God and be obedient to His voice.  - Deuteronomy 4: 30

Today I had an opportunity to experience the Voice of God.

No, it was not THE Voice that many seek in times of trial and tribulation nor was it the quiet voice that consoles those with a troubled Spirit.

This one was of manmade origins and after signing the longest NDA in my long career, I had an opportunity to witness it in operation.

I entered the demo as a sceptic.

I left the demo both amazed and disturbed.

I guess the dominant feeling depends on who I thought would use the technology and with what motivation and intention.

While not permitted to describe the exact technology (ha – like I could even try) or the nature of the demo I witnessed, for those who aren’t aware, technology exists to beam a message into someone else’s head.

It can be done without the knowledge of anyone other than the targeted recipient of the message.

The recipient is not necessarily aware that the message is originating from outside their mind instead of inside it.

The message can be made to sound like it is originating from a trusted source – a loved one, a friend …. or in some cases, God Himself.

And it is almost free of side effects, with “only” a few participants reporting that they have experienced light seizures or small strokes after participating.

But as I was assured by the person conducting the demo, it cannot be proven conclusively that the technology itself produced the subsequent health issues.

Uh huh.

Ohhhhhh the potential

Think of the potential (assuming that the device is in fact not frying people’s minds) if the technology is allowed to develop, getting smaller, become more advanced, etc.

1. Communication could get even more interesting, dispensing of the need to actually “hear” a conversation or risk a sensitive conversation being overheard.  Never again will we have to yell at the kids to turn the TV volume down since the sound would be beamed right into our head!

2. People who are terminally ill or in a coma could have soothing messages playing in their mind.

3. Children who feel afraid could hear the soothing voice of a parent telling them they are ok or giving advice in times of danger, generated by a device on the child’s belt that knows when the child senses fear.

4. Education could be sped up, with new knowledge flowing into our brains all the time - perhaps even context or situation dependent.

5. We could have projectile/explosive-free containment of hostile forces, becoming very useful for law enforcement, the military, etc.

6. One of the researchers I spoke to has been monitoring brain research with an eye towards figuring out at some point how to integrate some kind of signal that can inject images into someone’s mind (although they are a long ways from this yet).

Wow – dreams on demand ….. hopefully not against one’s will.

It’s all wonderful, isn’t it?

But then I think of the other side of the coin.

1. Advertisers shooting incessant messages to consume into our mind.

2. Politicians shooting self-promotion shtick into our minds during an election campaign.  Uggg … imagine if Anthony Weiner got his hands on this technology.

3. Business competitors sabotaging each other with inappropriate content.

4. The inability to walk away from “noise” just to find a place to sit and contemplate things.  We would need to make use of electronic “dead rooms” in order to create such quiet. A quiet “walk in the woods” mightn’t be quiet any more or it might be “enhanced”, with super HD-quality sounds of nature being fired into our brains to enhance our experience.

5. Pharmaceutical companies proving that you need the latest schizophrenia medication because you can’t make the voices in your head go away.

6. False memories being injected into someone’s head as the technology improves, making it easier to build consensus or incriminate the innocent.

7. Government leaders convincing their citizens that the controversial step they are about to take is actually very good for everyone – merely with the push of a button.  Can anyone say Syria?

8. Nations launching a new form of cyber warfare, directed at the minds of the citizens of an enemy nation or at the minds of the people who control their defense systems.

It would be like a person growing up in a small town in the deep South of the US and suddenly being transported to Manhattan during rush hour – experiencing a super energetic ballet of humanity and its potential or instant mayhem, chaos and madness.

Hmmm …. maybe those tinfoil hat guys are onto something.

Tin Foil Hat Guy

Hmmmm … maybe not.

The bottom line

The bottom line with this technology is that it is amazing but then it reminds me of our research into splitting the atom.

When we split the atom correctly, we get relatively clean electricity forever (the conundrum of safe disposal of  spent fuel rods not withstanding).

When we do it poorly, we get Fukushima and Chernobyl.

And when we use the technology maliciously, we get Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

I wonder which way we will go with the technology that I witnessed.

I know what I would like to see.

But human history, in all its potential, seems to make different choices when it comes to converting cool, amazing things into the tools of warfare.

Hopefully the human race will go out of character when it comes to this technology.

Otherwise, I suspect that a lot of people may at some point be praying in earnest, aching to hear the real Voice of God.

If they are able.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum – September 17, 2013

After the disturbing tragedy that occurred at the Washington Naval Yard yesterday, this interesting item was in the news today - Navy Yard shooter reported hearing voices 6 weeks before spree, police say.

Particularly interesting was this comment attributed to the assailant some weeks ago after he called police to come to his hotel room:

“Alexis told police that the three talked to him through the walls, floor or ceiling at three hotels — two commercial hotels in Rhode Island and one on a naval base there. He told them that they used a microwave machine to send vibrations and keep him awake.”

Are these the worries of a madman with a known mental health concern or are they something else?

The technology exists to accomplish this which doesn’t automatically imply that such technology was used.

Sadly, many truths disappear when a perpetrator is killed or takes his own Life.

Monday, September 2, 2013

Syria and the Art of Rationalization

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” - Carl Sagan, “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark”

“Rationalization is a process of not perceiving reality, but of attempting to make reality fit one’s emotions.” - Ayn Rand, “Philosophy: Who Needs It?”

Have you ever noticed how human beings can be fascinating (and disturbing) in how we rationalize things?

Take Syria as an example.

100,000 Syrians have been killed and countless Syrians have been wounded since their civil war began.

Amongst the wounded, untold thousands have lost limbs, eyes or other parts of their bodies and are permanently maimed.

Parents have lost children.

Children have become orphaned.

And yet it takes the use of chemical weapons by one side or the other to finally reach what we define as unacceptable behavior.

Which means that up to now, diplomats and politicians consider the wounding, maiming and killing of people (including children) as “acceptable” behavior.

I find that pretty disturbing and disappointing. It also makes me wonder what else diplomats and politicians consider normal behavior if they can rationalize this to be normal.

I’d like to ask our leaders about truths in the world but then I think of ….

1. My former father-in-law (a USAF Colonel) warning me of a pending, inevitable event of terrorists flying hijacked domestic aircraft into buildings (he told me in 1993) and yet we publicly acted surprised and outraged when 9/11 occurred 8 years later.

2. The issue with the nonexistent WMDs in Iraq and what that war produced - no tangible “win”, the region as unstable as ever and with thousands of their civilians and our troops killed or wounded.

3. The he said / she said about domestic surveillance, what is real versus what people claim they are doing.

4. Senator John McCain’s call that military strikes in Syria are necessary to “degrade Assad’s capabilities and upgrade that of the rebel forces” and the potential issues that such action will create, especially since we (including the government) know that the rebels are heavily infiltrated / supported by Al Qaeda.  Don’t forget that we trained Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan without a thought as to what happens when allies become foes.

5. John Kerry’s “knowledge” of the attack in Syria, how he knows who did it, why and with what even before the investigators on the ground know, culminating with his use of this photo as evidence.

ScreenHunter_17 Aug. 31 10.50

But I guess you’ve heard by now that the photo that John Kerry used, when he claimed he saw this carnage in Syria with his own eyes, was actually a recycled photo, having been taken in Iraq in 2003.

So if practically anything, no matter how heinous,  can be rationalized as acceptable and honesty is so elusive and hard to find within our leaders, I wonder what the collision of these two attributes will produce next.

Do you ever wonder?

Do you even care?

Because when we don’t care about the future we are creating, we become ensnared in a modern definition of irony:

Irony: If we have a nuclear (or other type of) war or other serious threats are made against us, the only ones who will be spared are the leaders who started it.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum

One final though on rationalization.  We condemn nations who use or threaten to use chemical, biological or nuclear weapons while we have stockpiles of all three (and have used one or more in our history). 

While the use of any of these weapons is undoubtedly evil, we wouldn’t have stockpiles of them unless we were prepared to use them (otherwise why even have them).

But I guess if that time ever arrives when we feel that we need to use them, we will have rationalized their use by then anyway so it will be all good.

Addendum – September 4, 2013

I guess we can’t ask Senator McCain for any information given that during the Syrian hearings yesterday, he was photographed playing poker on his iPhone and therefore probably not playing close attention.  At least he can cram for the final vote by reading his briefing notes later.

We can’t ask Mr. Kerry either given that US estimates of Syrian casualties are 4 times everyone else’s estimates (including the UK and France) but we are not allowed to know the reason for the discrepancy because the “methodology” that he used cannot be revealed due to national security reasons.

The US administration has also compared Syria’s threat to US national security as being on the same scale as the US not taking action against Nazi Germany during World War II.  The latter had aspirations to take over the world by force.  I don’t recall seeing Syria express any desire to do the same. 

Mr. Kerry also said today that the war against Syria would be ok because Arab countries have offered to pay for an invasion that unseats Assad.  If other governments can hire the US military to solve their own needs without any identifiable benefit to the US, doesn’t this degrade the great US military to being a bunch of hit men for hire?  Hasn’t the President constantly reiterated that his intention is to not unseat Assad? 

I wonder if leaders who zone out when critical matters are at hand, who can’t share information that would enable us to make informed, supportive decisions or who overhype reality are the types of leaders we need in challenging times.

Or has our democracy so devolved that our opinions don’t matter anymore?

Friday, August 30, 2013

By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War

Life is the art of being well deceived; and in order that the deception may succeed it must be habitual and uninterrupted.- William Hazlitt

In a well lit, richly furnished room, eight people sat around a huge conference room table, each reading an identical copy of a letter that had been delivered to each of their governments simultaneously only hours before.

“It is harshly worded”, the US Ambassador thought as she read it.  While it could be argued that it was penned by either a mad man or a genius, what worried her was that it contained truths that up to now had been believed to be known only by the people who sat around the table with her.

“Even Snowden’s cowardly act of treason wouldn’t have uncovered this”, she thought, “and it exceeds Assange’s paranoid delusions of what we are doing”.  She shivered as her eyes scanned the letter again.

The letter alluded to the many difficulties in the world and made direct references to what world governments had done to try to fix them in the early days and to hide them in modern times.  It also revealed some government’s acts to deliberately create many of those problems.

And it revealed each nation’s greatest weaknesses – politically, societally and militarily.

It was clearly written by someone who had direct access to more information than anyone she knew.

And while she and her colleagues had convened to discuss the developments in Syria, they had become distracted by “The Letter”.

However, it was the final paragraphs that concerned her the most.

The letter wrapped up by describing the strategic intentions of each nation, outlining confidential information that was, up to this moment, known only by its respective owners.

And so the playing field had been levelled, each of her colleague’s poker hands having been laid on the table before they had had an opportunity to ante up.

What worried her the most was the final paragraph, threatening to reveal to the world the deception that they had so carefully and cleverly woven over the decades.

“But why?”, she wondered. “What would be gained by creating such a panic around the world?”

She was also agitated that this was distracting her colleagues from discussing Syria.  The invasion of Syria was an important element in her leader’s domestic strategy, not its foreign policy, and it was important that she get them back on task.

“Ironic”, she mused grimly.  “A foreign war with nothing obvious to gain globally plays such an essential role in our domestic policy.  Too bad for the few Syrian citizens that were lost.  They are merely necessary collateral damage at this point”.

Truth be told, she didn’t like someone playing the same games on her that they had been playing on their citizens for decades.

And as her eyes scanned the room, she could tell that her colleagues were probably thinking the same thing.

-----------------------

An announcement came over the intercom that the aircraft was scheduled to touch down in 10 minutes.

The two lone occupants of the sleek private jet, noting the announcement, began to put their paperwork away.

“I still don’t understand why we are here”, grumbled one of the occupants.

“As I explained before, it is important to discuss our offer with the most powerful man on Earth”, replied his companion.

“Then why aren’t we flying to Washington?”, countered the first occupant.

“Because that’s not where the most powerful man on Earth is”, replied his companion, looking out the window as they winged past the beautiful architecture of Paris.

To be continued.

-----------------------

© 2013 – Harry Tucker – All Rights Reserved

Addendum:

This series, a departure from my usual musings,  is inspired as a result of conversations with former senior advisors to multiple Presidents of the United States, senior officers in the US Military and other interesting folks.

While this musing is just “fiction” and a departure from my musings on technology, strategy, politics and society, as a strategy guy, I do everything for a reason and with a measurable outcome in mind. :-)

This “fictional” musing is continued from ……

Serving Two Masters – August 22, 2013

Growing the Rot From Within – August 6, 2013

The Coming Storm – June 8, 2013

The Master of Distraction – May 15, 2013

Living on the Edge – How Close Do You Dare? - March 29, 2013

Preventing A Disaster – Or Preparing To Survive One - November 29, 2012)

Divide and Conquer - August 5, 2012

Financial Crisis – March 11, 2008

There is benefit to reading those first (oldest to newest) but it is not required.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Syria and the Secrets of Diplomacy

A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer - Bruce Lee

Over a year ago, I wrote about the toothlessness of the United Nations and many of its members as the travesty in Syria continued to unfold at that time.  My original musing is here - Syria and the Elephant in the Room.

In that musing, I compared the UN to Facebook:

The UN and Facebook – Similar Models

This is why the UN reminds me of how more than 90% of people use Facebook.

There’s a lot of talk and idea exchange.

Heated words or words of praise flow freely between “friends”.

But in the end, little of any real value is accomplished.

In August of 2012, the UN was expressing concern that "”Syria was being ripped apart” as described here.

President Obama has warned Syria repeatedly as described in this Slate article.

And now the President is indicating that the situation in Syria is upgraded to a “grave concern”.

So now that we are in a situation where there are more than 1 million Syrian children refugees and over 100,000 civil war deaths (according to the UN), does the situation assessment “grave concern” mean that we will see action soon or does it mean that we still need to progress through the conditions of:

- very grave concern

- extremely troublesome but inconvenient right now

- tremendously worrisome situation

- appalling tragedy

- super duper disgusting tragedy

- outrageous crimes against humanity

Or will our outrage get redirected when something more convenient, useful or valuable pops up in the meantime?

It’s difficult to say, especially when it is difficult to see what motivates our diplomats.  During an emergency session of the UN Security Council this week, US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power didn’t even bother attending because she had a personal trip to make.  The funny thing was that she was one of the people who was insisting that the UN take stronger action regarding Syria.

When we steamrolled over Iraq, one of the reasons we gave (besides the weapons of mass destruction debacle) was that we were allegedly freeing the citizens from a tyrannical dictator.

While we have such a situation in Syria, the world continues to do nothing but express “grave concern” as the years go by.

Which means to me that either we are not asking the right questions or no one is smart enough, inspired enough or has motivation enough to be bothered answering them.

Yes, I understand the complexities of competing international objectives, with the Russians selling weapons to the Syrians and all of that stuff.

I get it.

But as usual, it boils down to the alchemic science of diplomacy.

Ahhhh the art of diplomacy.

It is always serving a master and moving towards an end goal.

It’s too bad that the nature of the master and the end goals are not apparent to or seemingly in the interests of the planet whom the diplomats claim to be serving.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

Addendum

Do you want to know why nothing is happening in regards to Syria?  I believe the answer becomes clear when one considers what I described when I wrote Solving Puzzles–Follow the Breadcrumbs and Asking Questions That Get Answered.

Addendum – August 27, 2013

I’m not certain that the current US strategy, a military strike against Syria by Thursday, is the right one.  This is especially true given that at the time of this post, it had not been confirmed that gas had even been used and if it has been used, which side used it.

Whenever strategic action is taken, there always has to be a “and now what?” which follows each step – and the answer should be known before the step is taken.

So if, despite Russian / Chinese protests, the US strikes Syria with cruise missiles, we still come to that very question, regardless of whether the Syrian regime is toppled or not.

The question of “and now what?” will still need to be answered.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Syria and the Elephant in the Room

Some years ago, I was contacted by someone from the local Soviet Embassy who explained to me that they were giving away free trips for two to the Soviet Union as a goodwill gesture to people in other nations.

Being a natural sceptic who suspected a hoax, I asked for the lady’s phone number and politely ended the call.  I looked up the number for the Soviet Embassy and sure enough, it matched the number she had given me.

When I called the number back, the same lady answered the phone.  We chatted for a few minutes to explore the “prize”, after which I said I would think about it and hung up.

A few minutes later, my phone rang again but this time a member of the Canadian Intelligence community was on the phone.  He had listened to the conversation I had had with the lady at the Embassy and was now calling to explain what was really happening.

It turned out that I was on a list of people with Canadian Government Top Secret clearance.  The Soviets were calling everyone on the list to offer them genuine trips for two to the Motherland.  While in Moscow, they would wine and dine you and subtly explore whether or not you had a background of particular interest.  If so, they would work hard to “convince you” to immigrate to the Soviet Union.  Otherwise, you had a nice visit on their dime.

All was not what it appeared to be.

The same holds true with the issues that are unfolding in Syria (and a number of other nations for that matter).

The massacre that occurred in Houla, Syria is a heinous act that must be addressed immediately.  Unfortunately, speed is a trait not often demonstrated by the UN.

Then There’s the Elephant

Unfortunately, in addition to the toothlessness often demonstrated by the UN, there is an elephant in the room that must be addressed if we really want to tackle issues like the Syrian slaughter and other international matters.

Syria has a standing arms purchase agreement with Russia that will, when finally executed, have delivered over $4 billion in weapons over the course of the next 5-10 years.

Weapons that the Syrian government is using to kill its own citizens.

Russia, a member of the Security Council of the UN, is a significant enabler of the events in Syria.  They are not the only one (other nations including Iran and North Korea also contribute) but they are the single largest player.

The Security Council, within its mandate, may "recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment if it determines that a situation might endanger international peace and security. “

Of course, such a mandate becomes problematic when members of the Security Council are the ones endangering the peace and security of other nations in the first place.

If I put a gun in the hands of a 15 year old boy and he kills someone with it, he need to be punished.

However, as the enabler, I must be punished also.

Especially since, as the more “mature” person, I should have known better.

By the same token, the Syrian government must not be allowed to go scot-free when it comes to the evil they are perpetrating on their own people.

However, we need to point the finger where it deserves to be pointed and that is to the nations who enable Syria to do what they are doing.

But that doesn’t serve the intentions of the UN and so it chooses to do nothing with such inconvenient truths.

The UN and Facebook – Similar Models

This is why the UN reminds me of how more than 90% of people use Facebook.

There’s a lot of talk and idea exchange.

Heated words or words of praise flow freely between “friends”.

But in the end, little of any real value is accomplished.

This is Not a New Problem

Massacres in Syria have actually been going on for over 20 years and during that time, the UN has threatened to get really angry on different occasions.  Oooooo … sounds scary, doesn’t it? 

Not really.

When a UN envoy to Syria said the other day that it was time to have a “serious and frank discussion” with Syria, I would suggest that after 20 years of such suggestions, rebellious nations tend to ignore what you’re saying.

Now to be fair, Russia is not the only powerhouse supplying weapons to the world.  Our side has had its fair share of gun running also.  Only the occasional story actually makes it to the press (remember the Iran-Contra affair?).  For those interested in the subject, I recommend the thought provoking movie “Lord of War”.

Everything Is With Purpose

Everything happens for a reason. 

Russia provides arms to Syria for more reasons than just making money.

The UN doesn’t slap Russia for reasons of its own.

The US doesn’t squeeze the UN to slap Russia for its own reasons.

And as long as we are not privy to the myriad of reasons (or excuses) and we don’t care to demand accountability from people who in essence work for us, we will appear to be content with getting really angry in the media while the UN continues to issue strong words of condemnation.

Having done so, we will congratulate ourselves that we stood up for the rights of the downtrodden.

Meanwhile, the people who will pay the price will be like those who were slaughtered in Houla.

It’s because of events like this that I am reminded that while I’m very good with corporate diplomacy, I would make a lousy international diplomat.

The transparency and accountability that I would demand from all members of the UN would not only be unwelcome, it would be considered in the way of achieving the real agendas at play.

These agendas, sadly, make the massacre in Syria only the tip of the iceberg.

Massacres that will continue unless we do something more than just tell all our friends on Facebook how angry we are.

Maybe if we were holding our father, mother, sister, brother, son or daughter who had just been killed, then we might do more than express indignation or strong words of condemnation.

Maybe.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

PS For an interesting insider view of the UN, I recommend “Tower of Babble: How the United Nations Has Fueled Global Chaos” by Dore Gold.

Addendum – May 31, 2012

In a move that demonstrates that the UN’s motives are truly difficult to understand and in the midst of the Syrian disaster, the UN announced this week that Robert Mugabe, the president of Zimbabwe and with a number of UN sanctions against him, has been honored by being invited to join the “Global Leaders for Tourism” group.

A man who has been accused of human right violations, corruption and brutal repression has been appointed as a “leader” by the UN.

It shouldn’t make sense.  But since everything happens for a reason, it does make sense to someone.

I wonder who that “someone” is.

Addendum – August 3, 2012

This demonstrates what I mean when I express concern over how the UN executes when it comes to Syria.  Months after I wrote this blog, the UN continues to meet to issue words of condemnation.  What a waste of time and lives.