The dialog around Lance Armstrong and his fall from grace with the admission of doping has been intriguing, with the majority of people being thoroughly disgusted.
I am intrigued by the dialog, with my curiosity falling into the category of “rationalization fascination”.
But first a digression ….
If I murder my neighbour, it is considered an illegal and immoral act and I am punished as a result.
If as a soldier, I kill the enemy (for whatever reason), I am considered a hero, doing what it takes to protect my buddy, my nation and the world-at-large.
If a woman aborts a fetus, not for the protection of herself or her unborn child but because the pregnancy is inconvenient, then this act is referred to as asserting personal choice.
If I am sentenced to death for committing a heinous crime, this act of killing is referred to as justice.
They are all the same act of taking a Life but which present four different interpretations based on context and perspective.
We live in a world of win-at-all-cost
In our world today, we are taught to do whatever it takes to win. Sure we talk about collaboration, win-win and all of that stuff but a lot of times, the message that reaches our brain, whether because we are told implicitly or explicitly, is to do whatever it takes.
When the stakes or rewards are low in the grand scheme of things, our sense of morals and ethics is not really tested.
However, I would posit that when the stakes and rewards are very high, it is at that point that our sense of right and wrong is really tested and we are challenged to understand what our interpretation of do whatever it takes really is.
And so while it is easy to be critical of Lance Armstrong and what he did, I wonder how many of us would automatically take the ethical / moral / legal highroad when faced with a situation where the reward potential for ourselves, our family, our company, etc. is very high.
It it easy for us to say that we would automatically do the right thing.
But having worked with many people over the years who risked huge failure in order to manifest huge rewards, I can assure you that the lines of what it is in and out of bounds get very blurry when much is on the line.
There are many gray lines in Life when the stakes are high.
And so, while I believe Lance Armstrong definitely did the wrong thing, I see a different perspective as to why he did it.
I would also suggest that if you can’t understand why he did it, then perhaps you haven’t lived to your ultimate potential yet, where you would be forced to face the temptation to violate your own morals and ethics because the reward potential for doing so was so great.
Those who have lived to their highest potential know the difficult choices I am referring to.
Lance Armstrong is a product of our society
In a society that suggests that you do what you want and beg for forgiveness later, I would suggest that Lance Armstrong did the wrong thing … but we as a society encouraged him to do so.
It’s similar to the paradox of capitalism. In capitalism, we are encouraged to grow our business as large as we can make it …. until our success is so great that we are considered a monopoly and are broken up, fined or punished in some way for growing too large.
In the Gospel of John, chapter 8, verses 7-9, we have the popularly quoted lesson:
And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” And once more he bent down and wrote on the ground. But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. – ESV
While I don’t condone Mr. Armstrong, for his cheating and what he put others through to cover up his actions, I can’t judge him either because I, like many in my circles, have been in the situation where I had to choose correctly.
And many of us in that situation know that oftentimes, even the greatest amongst us fall to temptation when said temptation offers tantalizing rewards or the opportunity to hide from paralyzing or humiliating punishment.
This is not a licence to just allow anyone to do anything.
However, it is not a licence to judge without appropriate context either.
And so I will lay my stone and walk away.
What will you do with your stone?
In service and servanthood,
Harry
PS It could be said that to be quick to judge others without context allows one to overlook one’s own difficulties, shortcomings or mistakes. However, to suggest this would be judging others, wouldn’t it? :-)
