Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Ignorant Shall Relinquish the Earth

Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all. - John F. Kennedy

The greater our knowledge increases the more our ignorance unfolds. - John F. Kennedy

The #1206 “fiction” series continues ….


She squinted in the glare of the hot, bright studio lights, wondering why she had agreed to this interview.  Her agitation was growing as she realized that the interviewer had deftly debated her into an indefensible corner.

“So”, the interviewer pressed, “Allow me to summarize your key points.  One. That your party will win the next election because everyone simply knows you are better.  Two.  The other party can’t win because everyone knows they are led by an idiot.  Three. No change of strategy or approach is needed to win the next election because of the first two points.  Have I summarized your ideas fairly and accurately?”

She paused for a moment, realizing that she had said these points exactly as he expressed them and on live television at that and so to deny them didn’t exactly help her cause.  “What more truth and facts do you need?”, she snapped at the interviewer.

As she continued to speak, two men watched with interest from the control room.

The first of the two men glanced at his companion and noted “She has no idea what the difference is between emotion and facts.  I would think that suggests that the dumbing down of the people is almost complete.  What do you think?”

His companion smiled as he watched the interview winding down.  He chuckled and then replied, “I didn’t think you could pull this off but I have to admit it has gone far better than I thought it would. Look at the debates in progress.  The nations of the world are split on the realities and ramifications of global warming.  Nations talk peace while refusing to acknowledge that there are approximately 125 wars and local insurgencies happening at any given moment on their planet, in large part fuelled by the UN Security Council.  Legislatures and courts churn over the rights of minorities who make up a very small percentage of the population but who vehemently demand more rights than others under the auspices that they feel threatened and oppressed.”

He continued, “Meanwhile, the Earth’s ability to support an ever-growing population may have already passed the point of no return.  Governments have moved into the role of public relations instead of governing as their ability to manage ever-increasingly complex issues has long since disappeared. The list goes on and on.  The people are divided over issues where emotion, especially fear and anger, rule every dialog while solutions continue to elude them.”

He paused before continuing, “And finally, people continue to waste more time on mind numbing social media activities while their input into important items around the world continues to decline.  The ignorant and the uninformed use social media to shout down others who dare to engage in idea exchange and the questioning of unsolved issues in the world.  And because enough people couldn’t be dumbed down or intimidated fast enough for our intentions, legislation allowing more of them to legally partake in recreational drug usage has gotten us back on schedule.  A populace that thinks less or feels intimidated to ask questions, questions less.  Well done – you must be very proud!”

“I am very proud”, the first man said, “The last steps of preparation are almost complete!  There are, however, some pockets of resistance that remain that must be neutralized in order to ensure victory.”

“And how is our plan coming along to accomplish this?”, his companion asked.

Before the first man could answer, he was suddenly distracted by the chime of his cell phone.  Unclipping it from his belt, he studied the screen for a few moments before looking up and smiling.  He held his phone out to his companion to allow him to examine the screen contents.

As his companion read the screen before him, he suddenly smiled.  “The intelligence services on this planet are indeed useful”, he said.

“They are indeed”, replied the first man.  “A united Earth is not useful to us.  However, one divided by anger and paranoia – now that’s a different story!  Our plans continue unabated.”

He returned his gaze to the monitor, observing the interview as it wrapped up.

“A world ruled by fear, the inability to evaluate situations based on data and the inability to exchange ideas peacefully”, he said quietly.  “Their projection of their own inner insecurities defines their perception of their world. Their perception reveals their needs and intentions.  Their needs and intentions reveal their weaknesses.  Their weaknesses become our strengths.  They believe they are so defined by their past that they waste their present and leave their future open to be defined by someone else.”

He paused for a moment.

“By the way”, he continued, “Don’t forget that our presentation to the President is still on for 9 am tomorrow morning.”

His companion nodded, lost in his own thoughts.

Both men became silent as they stared at the control room monitors.

To be continued.


© 2014 – Harry Tucker – All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer:

All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Series Origin:

This series, a departure from my usual musings,  is inspired as a result of conversations with former senior advisors to multiple Presidents of the United States, senior officers in the US Military and other interesting folks.

While this musing is just “fiction” and a departure from my musings on technology, strategy, politics and society, as a strategy guy, I do everything for a reason and with a measurable outcome in mind. :-)

This “fictional” musing is a continuation of the #1206 series noted here.


Monday, October 28, 2013

The Downfall of the NSA

A guest post by Gwynne Dyer, author, historian and independent journalist.  Shared with written permission of the author.

Gwynne Dyer
32 Lyme Street
London NW1 0EE
England
26 October 2013

Politicians and government officials rarely tell outright lies; the cost of being caught out in a lie is too high. Instead, they make carefully worded statements that seem to address the issue, but avoid the truth. Like, for example, Caitlin Hayden, the White House spokesperson who replied on 24 October to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s angry protest at the tapping of her mobile phone by the US National Security Agency.

“The United States is not monitoring and will not monitor the communications of Chancellor Merkel,” she said. Yes, Caitlin, but has the US been listening to Merkel’s mobile phone calls from 2002 until the day before yesterday? “Beyond that, I’m not in a position to comment publicly on every specific alleged intelligence activity.”

By 27 October, the argument had moved on. The question now was: did President Barack Obama know the Chancellor’s phone was bugged? (The German tabloid Bild am Sonntag reported that General Keith Alexander, head of the NSA, told Obama about it in 2010. Obama allegedly said that the surveillance should continue, as “he did not trust her.”)

Now it was the turn of the NSA spokesperson, Vanee Vines, to deny the truth. “(General) Alexander did not discuss with President Obama in 2010 an alleged foreign intelligence operation involving German Chancellor Merkel, nor has he ever discussed alleged operations involving Chancellor Merkel,” she said. But she carefully avoided saying that Obama had not been told at all.

The ridiculous thing about these meticulously crafted pseudo-denials is that they leave a truth-shaped hole for everyone to see. Of course the United States has been listening to Angela Merkel’s phone calls since 2002, and of course Obama knew about it. It would have been quite easy to deny those facts if they were not true.

The NSA is completely out of control. Its German outpost was brazenly located on the fourth floor of the US embassy in Berlin, and leaked documents published by Der Spiegel say that the NSA maintains similar operations in 80 other US embassies and consulates around the world.

The Guardian, also relying on documents provided by whistle-blower Edward Snowden, reported recently that a total of 35 national leaders have been targeted by the NSA. We know that the German, Brazilian and Mexican leaders were bugged, but it’s almost certain that the leaders of France, Spain and Italy, Egypt, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and Japan, India and Indonesia were also targeted. Not to mention Russia and China.

The only one of the NSA’s high-level victims to speak out yet, apart from Angela Merkel, is President Dilma Roussef of Brazil. Last month she told the UN General Assembly: “Personal data of (Brazilian) citizens was intercepted indiscriminately. Corporate information – often of high economic and even strategic value – was at the centre of espionage activity....The office of the president itself had its communications intercepted.”

“Friendly governments and societies that seek to build a true strategic partnership... cannot allow recurring illegal actions to take place as if they were normal,” Roussef concluded. “They are unacceptable.” And you wonder how the brilliant, power-drunk fools at the NSA could possibly have believed they could get away with this kind of behaviour indefinitely.

The 4.9 million (!) Americans with access to classified information include 480,000 civilian contractors with the same “top secret” security clearance as Snowden. Even if all the military and public servants could be trusted to keep the NSA’s guilty secret forever (unlikely) and only one in a hundred of the contractors was outraged by it, then there were still 4,800 potential whistle-blowers waiting to blow. If Snowden hadn’t, somebody else would have.

When the astounding scale and scope of the agency’s operations finally came out, it was bound to create intense pressure on Washington to rein in the NSA. The agency can deflect the domestic pressure, to some extent, by insisting that it’s all being done to keep Americans safe from terrorism, but it can’t persuade the president of South Korea or the prime minister of Bangladesh that she was being bugged because she was a terrorist suspect.

The NSA’s worst abuse has been its violation of the privacy of hundreds of millions of private citizens at home and abroad, but it’s the pressure from furious foreign leaders that will finally force the US government to act. “Trust in our ally the USA has been shattered,” said German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich on Sunday. “If the Americans have tapped mobile phones in Germany, then they have broken German law on German soil.”

This will end up in the German courts, and probably in those of many other countries as well (and Snowden may well end up being granted asylum in Germany). To rebuild its relations with its key allies, the White House is going to have to radically curb the NSA’s powers. Good.

We don’t have to listen to the spooks and their allies telling us that since the new communications technologies make total surveillance possible, it is therefore inevitable. “If it can be done, it will be done” is a counsel of despair. Most of the NSA’s ever-expanding activities over the past ten years have served no legitimate purpose, and it’s high time that it was forced to obey both the letter and the spirit of the law.

----------------------------

Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

The Coffee Shop–The New Source of Privacy Leaks

I was in a coffee shop this morning where I couldn’t help but overhear a very loud conversation taking place. 

It was a strategy planning session for Alberta Health Services and ironically, the strategy session was about protecting privacy.  Names were named, email addresses and phone numbers were tossed around, different people’s positions were discussed, ways to bypass “difficult people” were evaluated, strategies to secure capital in a time of austerity were discussed, etc.

It was probably a conversation that I shouldn’t have heard and I won’t share details of it nor did I take notes.

However, it is not the first Alberta Health Services conversation I have heard in a public place.  I remember overhearing a nurse last year who proudly pointed out to a coffee colleague that she only looks up private patient information on behalf of people that she can trust and in a specific way so that no one else finds out she is doing it.

The only problem is that if you really want to keep a secret you don’t tell anyone – especially in a public place. :-)

I’m not picking on Alberta Health Services. 

I have overheard accountants discussing a company’s financial position in public (without the owners being present), lawyers planning their defense for murder, DUI cases and other litigation matters, politicians discussing strategy, senior politicians who left confidential or classified briefing notes on their table while they went to the restroom, confidential employee reviews, married lovers planning adulterous rendezvous, businessmen preparing for hostile takeovers, etc.

And then there is the less impactful but potentially problematic “Are you ready for me to read my credit card # to you?  It is ….. and the expiry date is …… and the name on the card is …..”.

I have been approached by lawyers and businessmen who, upon realizing that they were overheard, approached me and demanded I sign an NDA, which I have refused (although I have told a few of those folks that if they worked for me, they would have been fired immediately for indiscriminately sharing confidential information).

And I interrupted a potential terrorist who was writing a pro-Jihad presentation.  I wrote about this event in The Power of Trusting Your Instinct.

Protecting privacy used to be a source of humor

Back in the late 60s, we used to laugh at the character of Maxwell Smart in the TV Series “Get Smart” when he would insist upon using the Cone of Silence to protect the privacy of sensitive conversations.

But in the modern era, privacy is not a laughing matter.  We get up in arms about the NSA, Facebook and other groups snooping in our emails, social media interactions and phone calls while we freely share information that we shouldn’t (especially regarding our children) and we speak loudly in public places when we probably should wait for a more private moment. 

We log onto public Wi-Fi and conduct sensitive transactions despite the number of products out there that have been demonstrated to be able to read our online interactions no matter how secure those interactions are according to software vendors.

And yet we cry foul when someone else contravenes our privacy.

Protection of our privacy, whether personal or professional, is not only a matter for other organizations, private, public, judicial or legislative to take care of.

It is something we need to play a bigger role in ourselves.

Otherwise, it doesn’t matter what groups like the NSA or Facebook do – we’ve given it all away anyway.

Most of us who overhear or see that which we shouldn’t are trustworthy and will do nothing with the incessant flow of sensitive information that comes in our direction.

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for all members of the human species.

Do you really want to take the risk of not knowing who is in the room taking notes?

I didn’t think so.

In service and servanthood,

Harry

PS Bad news, ██████████. You are about to be fired from ██████████ in Calgary.  HR and corporate legal just wrapped up their meeting at the table beside me and will tell you on Friday.  I Googled your name and found you in LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook but it’s not my place to tell you.

Or is it – you appear to be a nice family guy from what you have shared publicly.  The GPS coords on the photos of your family are a nice touch also … if someone wanted to violate the personal space of your family.  Hmmmm … maybe you’re not so smart after all.


Addendum – August 20, 2013

I wrote about the same subject back in February of 2012 in the blog post Privacy and the Real Weakest Link, highlighting some of my concerns then. While not trying to be redundant, I think it is a subject that is worthy of revisiting once in a while until organizations and the people who represent them get their act together when it comes to privacy. 

What is curious to me as I revisit that blog entry is that it mentioned two social workers who were openly discussing (with some level of disgust) their current cases (with names).  I wonder if they were associated with Alberta Health Services also.  I hope note.

I also noticed that I was in a coffee shop when I wrote that blog also.  Before anyone asks, the answer is “No – I don’t live in or own a coffee shop”. :-)


Addendum – No One Cares - April 15, 2014

As news broke today of over $1 Billion in spending within AHS via sole-sourced contracts (in some cases in violation of its own rules) I reviewed some email exchanges I had with AHS staff where I described the things I noted in this blog post and other posts

For the different interactions, people thanked me for the emails (proving they received them) but they never seemed to care nor did they ever bother asking for details.

I wonder what it will take to make them care.